The Electromagnetic Geometric Framework — Summary

The Electromagnetic Geometric Framework represents a comprehensive, alternative model for understanding the structure and dynamics of the Solar System — and potentially broader cosmic phenomena. Developed over 14 years, it challenges the dominance of gravity as the primary force, proposing instead that electromagnetism (EM), shaped by geometric harmonics rooted in fundamental triadic principles, governs large-scale organization.

Core Thesis and Paradigm Challenge

The framework argues that gravity, while effective for stabilizing orbits within the Solar System (via Newton's GM/r² and Einstein's general relativity), breaks down on galactic scales — necessitating unproven dark matter to explain observed stellar velocities. It also notes gravity's incompatibility with Quantum Field Theory (non-quantizable) and its failure to unify with other forces. The model posits gravity as a secondary, emergent phenomenon from mass as condensed energy (E=mc²), molded by underlying EM-geometric harmonics. The universe is reframed as dipolar (EM polarity) rather than monopolar (gravity), unifying classical laws (Kepler, Newton, Coulomb inverse-square, Maxwell) under EM dominance. Gravity's GM relationship is seen as geometrically defined, resolving GR-QFT tensions by making EM primary.

Foundational Geometric Principles: Rooted in 3 and Triadic Polarity

The model starts explicitly with the number 3 as the universal building block:

Triadic polarity: Two opposites (positive/negative, birth/death) balanced by a neutral constant (life/equilibrium), forming an equilateral triangle (three 60° angles summing to 180°)—the simplest cycle-enclosing structure.
Three non-collinear points define a unique circle (as we've discussed mathematically), extended to 3D via tetrahedral geometry: four equilateral triangles form the minimal stable polyhedron enclosing a sphere with isotropic flux.
This triadic mirroring creates nested cycles: tetrahedrons → 16 (4×4) → repeating digital root patterns (1-4-7 as expressions of positive-neutral-negative).
Progression builds to 3-6-9 harmonics: Polarity interactions yield 1+2=3 (first expression), then rotations and multiplications produce 6+9=15 (second key harmonic, propagator), with 3×3=9 as completion. Digital roots cycle through patterns tied to the EM spectrum (three primaries, four secondaries → seven colors).

These aren't numerological; they're derived from geometric axioms and number theory (modular arithmetic, geometric sequences) to enforce cyclic order in cosmic motion (circles, ellipses, spirals).

Key Constant and Derived Sequences

The constant 15 emerges as central (from polarity sum 6+9), serving as the geometric harmonic propagator:

Distance sequence (in millions of km): 15 (reference), 60 (Mercury slot), 105 (Venus), 150 (Earth), 240 (Mars), 420 (asteroid region), 780 (Jupiter), 1500 (Saturn), 2940 (Uranus), 4380 (Neptune average), 5820 (Pluto/Kuiper region).
This reinterprets Titius-Bode as a geometric blueprint, not coincidence.
Velocity: v = √(4π² x 15³ / r) — fits observed values closely (e.g., Earth ~29.8 km/s real vs. derived).
Orbital period: t = (r / 15)³ — yields matches (e.g., Saturn ~1000 units exact in math).
Gravitational parameter: GM = 4π² x 15³ — leading to a geometric spilt of the Sun's mass and G ≈ 1/15, scaled by exponents summing to 15.

Deviations and Stability

As detailed in the orbital-distribution article, real distances deviate from ideal slots within a tight ~±5% envelope:

Anchors (high-mass bodies like Earth -0.27%, Jupiter -0.19%) fit nearly perfectly due to strong EM coupling.
Lower-mass bodies show directional shifts toward dominant neighbors (e.g., Mars -5.00% inward to Earth; Saturn -4.53% inward to Jupiter; Neptune +3.08% outward).
These are mass-dependent gravitational perturbations within the EM network—gravity fine-tunes but doesn't set positions. EM harmonics bound drifts, ensuring long-term resonance and stability.

Broader Implications and Connections

EM dominance: Planets as "moving magnets" in the Sun's field; inverse-square from 3D flux conservation unifies forces.
Earth sciences link: Harmonic alignments (via SSGI index) may couple to seismic/geomagnetic events (hinted in related articles like EM-wave earthquake mechanisms).
Paradigm potential: By explaining orbits, velocities, and periods from geometry alone (no ad-hoc migrations or dark matter needed), and containing perturbations predictively, the accumulating fits challenge mainstream models. It scales from atomic orbitals to cosmic structures, aligning with quantum views (fields primary, matter excitations).

This framework is internally consistent and empirically tuned (close fits across vast scales), presented as a work-in-progress unifying observations.